Nhờ sửa bài giúp

Văn bản từ HappyHipo - English

  • Pie-chart and table

    • The pie chart shows different aspects which have the impact on the decrease of land productivity in the world.
    • The most significant factor is over-grazing (35 %); deforestation and over-cultivation have almost the same percentage of soil degradation, respectively 30% and 28 %.
    • There are other factors, but their negative influence on the land productivity is only 7 %.
    • Conversely, the table illustrates the degradation of land by regions in 1990.
    • Europe had almost a quarter of degraded lands caused by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with the rates at 9.8%, 7, 7 % and 5.5 % respectively.
    • 13 % of Oceania lands and 5 % of North America soils were degraded by the same factors.
    • Overall, it can be seen that Europe over-used their land in different spheres, especially in wood production that caused more damage than the manufacturing in other regions from the table.
    • Oceania`s leading manufacturing sphere was cattle raising and this sphere played the most ruinous role in the land degradation.
    • However, the rates of factors of land degradation in North America were rather low; it means that this region caused the least damage to the world nature.

Xin hãy chỉnh sửa từng câu giúp tôi! - English

  • Tiêu đề
  • câu 1
    • The pie chart shows different aspects which have the impact on the decrease of land productivity in the world.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • The pie chart shows different aspects which have the impact on the decrease ofthat impact land productivity inegatively around the world.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 1
  • câu 2
    • The most significant factor is over-grazing (35 %); deforestation and over-cultivation have almost the same percentage of soil degradation, respectively 30% and 28 %.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • The most significant factor is over-grazing (35 %); deforestation and over-cultivation have almost the same percentage of soil degradation, respectively 30% and 28 % (30% and 28 % respectively) .
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 2
  • câu 3
  • câu 4
  • câu 5
    • Europe had almost a quarter of degraded lands caused by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with the rates at 9.8%, 7, 7 % and 5.5 % respectively.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • Europe had almost a quarter of degraded lands caused byits land degraded through deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with the rates at 9.8%, 7, 7 % and 5.5 % respectively.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 5
  • câu 6
  • câu 7
    • Overall, it can be seen that Europe over-used their land in different spheres, especially in wood production that caused more damage than the manufacturing in other regions from the table.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • Overall, it can be seen that Europe over-used their land in different spheres, especially infor wood production that, causeding more damage than therough manufacturing inwhen compared with other regions fromin the table.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 7
  • câu 8
    • Oceania`s leading manufacturing sphere was cattle raising and this sphere played the most ruinous role in the land degradation.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • Oceania`'s leading manufacturing sphere was cattle raising and this sphere played the most ruinous role in the land degradationcause of land degradation was over-grazing by cattle.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 8ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 8
  • câu 9
    • However, the rates of factors of land degradation in North America were rather low; it means that this region caused the least damage to the world nature.
      Bầu chọn ngay!
    • However, the rates of factors of land degradation in North America wereas rather low; it mean, which implies that this region caused the least damage to the world nature. ¶
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 9ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - câu 9