-
- Afrikaans
- Toskë
- العربية القياسية
- Български език
- Беларуская мова
- Català
- 官话
- Hrvatski jezik
- Český jazyk
- Dansk
- Nederlands
- English
- Esperanto
- Eesti keel
- Suomen kieli
- Français
- Galego
- Deutsch
- Νέα Ελληνικά
- עברית
- हिन्दी
- Magyar
- Bahasa Indonesia
- Italiano
- 日本語
- Қазақ тілі
- 한국어
- Lingua Latina
- Lietuvių kalba
- Bahasa Melayu
- Norsk Bokmål
- فارسی
- Język polski
- Português
- Limba Română
- Русский язык
- Српски
- Slovenčina
- Español
- Svenska
- Wikang Tagalog
- ภาษาไทย
- Türkçe
- Українська мова
- Tiếng Việt
- Afrikaans
Văn bản từ Manonsrz - English
Smart devices
- Today, we have to note the ubiquity of technology, we leave some data wherever we go.
- This phenomenon rise with development of smart devices such as pacemaker, fitbit, Amazon Echoes...
- So many pieces of evidence that could undermine alibis or testimonials .
- It's a formidable weapon for investigators.
- The investigation are already different today compared to ten years ago : police can prove a crime with a smart device.
- Everybody is connected so it's most esier today to discover what the suspect did on the day of the crime.
- We can expect less of outstanding files.
- Moreover, the work of police is also keeped under surveillance : there are cameras in police stations, and we could imagine a sensor inside police guns in order to know the use of firearms, and their location.
- In England, a system is used to predict the probability that a delinquent reoffends, hinge on gravity of the offense that he commited and antecedents.
- A lot of predictive softwares could see the light of day in the coming years even in France.
- Smart devices come to the fore an important issue for right to privacy.
- All the comings and goings are scrutinised.
- The technical means that are smart device don't let almost place for doubt in investigator's mind while they aren't always reliable.
- So, this could cause judicial errors.
- Without backing down, we have to regulate specially the possibility to use smart devices.
- It will be necessary to educate new generation to make young people fully aware of everything they do with new technologies is recorded.
- This acquaintance is essential because the opposite would be an hurdle for privacy.
- Indeed, when some cities install cameras in their streets, a sign inform people.
- Indeed, the goal musn't be to trick people.
- The warning participate to dissuasion.
- It would be urgent to recruit more persons to analyse data because research of evidences by way of new technologies will increase more and more.
- But it should provide for a safeguard for instance disciplinary measures if these persons handle data unfairly.
- Indeed, it could be tempting to use data of all persons even if there is a tiny risk that she is implicated.
- To verify by the way of smart devices is more simple, but if we don't limit this, we harm without scruples privacy of innocent persons.
- So, we have to limit this to fishy people.
- Plenty of criminals could play with the smart devices to mock reality and to create for theirselves fake alibis.
- Thus, policers will must to be more cunning than smart devices.
- Manonsrz
November 2017
Bầu chọn ngay!
Xin hãy chỉnh sửa từng câu giúp tôi! - English