Düzeltmeler

Şimdi düzeltmeye yardım et!Düzeltilmemiş

Lesheey'den mesaj - English

  • To censor or not?

    • There are different opinions regard to the question whether TV, radio and other sources of information and content produced by them should be supervised strongly.
    • One part of the society, mostly conservative, sure that government obliged to check any information before publishing, other controversially insists on negative influence of this phenomenon, arguing that any intervention unacceptable, does not matter how delicate it is to exercise.
  • Both sides of the argument will be analyzed before a logical conclusion is drawn and my own perspective is given.
    • It is known that information is a powerful tool for influencing society, therefore, there is a possibility that some individuals will resort to various tricks to achieve the desired result using false news.
  • Moreover, it is obvious that one of the main tasks of any state is the protection of citizens, including dangerous information that can become a threat to the stability of society.
  • If the state would not filter the information, some terrorist organizations, using the media, can try to influence the younger generation, and there are many such examples in history.
    • For example, according to a court decisions, in my country users are denied access to various Internet portals that place illegal information.
    • Looking from the other point of view, it is impossible to disagree that freedom of expression is one those pillars on which any civilized society relies and progresses.
  • In other words, without freedom of speech, it is impossible to postulate a completely free state, no matter what other freedoms and benefits it can substitute for.
  • In addition, it is also likely that the opposite situation will happen when political leaders, using censorship, will in such a way eliminate political competitors under the cover of a struggle, for instance, with terrorism.
  • In conclusion, I am convinced that the government should closely monitor the situation, intervening only in cases where it threatens citizens, strictly observing democratic values.

Lütfen, Her cümleyi düzeltmek için yardım edin ! - English

  • Başlık
  • cümle 1
    • There are different opinions regard to the question whether TV, radio and other sources of information and content produced by them should be supervised strongly.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • There are different opinions regard toing the question whether TV, radio and other sources of information and content produced by them should be supervised strongly.
      AjayKumarAjayKumar profile picture Yorumlar
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 1YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 1
  • cümle 2
    • One part of the society, mostly conservative, sure that government obliged to check any information before publishing, other controversially insists on negative influence of this phenomenon, arguing that any intervention unacceptable, does not matter how delicate it is to exercise.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • One part of the society, mostly conservative,is sure that government is obliged to check any information before publishing, other controversially insists on negative influence of this phenomenon, arguing that any intervention is unacceptable,and it does not matter how delicate it is to exercise.
      AjayKumarAjayKumar profile picture Yorumlar
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 2YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 2
  • cümle 3
  • cümle 4
    • It is known that information is a powerful tool for influencing society, therefore, there is a possibility that some individuals will resort to various tricks to achieve the desired result using false news.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • It is known that information is a powerful tool for influencing society, and therefore, there is a possibility that some individuals will resort to various tricks to achieve the desired result using false news.
      AjayKumarAjayKumar profile picture Yorumlar
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 4YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 4
  • cümle 5
    • Moreover, it is obvious that one of the main tasks of any state is the protection of citizens, including dangerous information that can become a threat to the stability of society.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 5YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 5
  • cümle 6
    • If the state would not filter the information, some terrorist organizations, using the media, can try to influence the younger generation, and there are many such examples in history.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 6YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 6
  • cümle 7
    • For example, according to a court decisions, in my country users are denied access to various Internet portals that place illegal information.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • For example, according to a court's decisions, in my country users are denied access to various Internet portals that place illegal information.
      AjayKumarAjayKumar profile picture Yorumlar
      100% GOOD (2 votes)
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 7YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 7
  • cümle 8
    • Looking from the other point of view, it is impossible to disagree that freedom of expression is one those pillars on which any civilized society relies and progresses.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • Looking from the other point of view, it is impossible to disagree that freedom of expression is one of those pillars on which any civilized society relies and progresses.
      AjayKumarAjayKumar profile picture Yorumlar
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 8YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 8
  • cümle 9
    • In other words, without freedom of speech, it is impossible to postulate a completely free state, no matter what other freedoms and benefits it can substitute for.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 9YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 9
  • cümle 10
    • In addition, it is also likely that the opposite situation will happen when political leaders, using censorship, will in such a way eliminate political competitors under the cover of a struggle, for instance, with terrorism.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 10YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 10
  • cümle 11
    • In conclusion, I am convinced that the government should closely monitor the situation, intervening only in cases where it threatens citizens, strictly observing democratic values.
      Şİmdi oyla!
    • YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 11YENİ bir DÜZELTME EKLE! - cümle 11