Hello!
I'm trying to understand precise meaning of all parts of the following sentence:
Can you kind of catch me up on what you see as your role in the company?
So, if it would me who compiled such a phrase, then it would be:
Can you catch me up on what you see your role in the company?
So, I can't recognise overtone of selected parts below:
Can you kind of catch me up on what you see as your role in the company?
PS: Discover these free English lessons: Free training: (a)round and about — Confusion between Adjectives and Adverbs — Phrasal Verbs with OFF — Countable and Uncountable Nouns
- TorinoSFebruary 2022
GIVE ANSWERS
AussieInBgFebruary 2022 This is very colloquial American English. Paraphrasing the sentence: ”Can you in short update me on what you think/believe your role in the company is.” ”kind of” It doesn’t mean ”type of”. It could be translated as ”in short” or ”in summary”. ”as” is part of the grammatical construction: ”to see sth/sb as sth/sb/ (doing sth)” = ”to think/believe sb/sth (in future) is/would be/will be sth/sb/ (doing sth)” |
vincentFebruary 2022 @Aussie ok thanks
AussieInBgFebruary 2022 @Torinos No worries!
You sentence was deceptively simple. The words by themselves look very simple. However, there is also a formal complex grammatical construction.
Also complicating things - mixing the highly informal usage of ”kind of” with that formal grammar.
TorinoSFebruary 2022 Oh, thanks a lot!
You really helped!
AussieInBgFebruary 2022 Because the question is not only just about the present role in the company, but ascertaining what the person believes his/her future role will be and what form that would take.
A question like ”What is your role in the company?” only would tell us the job title and nothing more.
If I presented every short form question for each piece of information the questioner is trying to elicit in that sentence - that would be really wordy
vincentFebruary 2022 that’s very wordy! why can’t he/she just say ”What is your role in the company?” LOL
AussieInBgFebruary 2022 Although the word by themselves ”look simple”, the grammatical construction is definitely not
vincentFebruary 2022 that’s clearer LOL