Korjaukset

AUTA KORJAAMAAN NYT!korjattu

Text from maya44 - English

    • JUdgment

    • In this case, the questions raised before the Supreme Court are the following ones: Are Schenk’s acts protected by the Freedom of Speech, included in the First Amendment?
  • Is the ruling delivered by the District Court complying with the First Amendment?
  • Is the Espionage Act complying with the First amendment?
  • No, Schenk’s actions are not protected by the First Amendment and the ruling given by the District Court is in compliance with the First Amendment as it respects the Espionage Act.
    • It has to be noticed that the character of every act depends upon the circumstances in which it is done.
    • In ordinary times, the defendants, in mailing such flyers would have been within their constitutional rights.
  • Moreover, Freedom of speech always has limits when words and expressions are used in a way as to create a clear and present danger.
  • For instance, a man who falsely shouts fire in a theatre would not be protected by the First Amendment.
    • Likewise, during wartime, many words and expressions that might be said in time of peace are harming its effort that their utterance will not be endured until the end of the war.
    • The judgment below for those reasons must be affirmed.

PLEASE, HELP TO CORRECT EACH SENTENCE! - English

  • Otsikko
  • Lause 1
    • In this case, the questions raised before the Supreme Court are the following ones: Are Schenk’s acts protected by the Freedom of Speech, included in the First Amendment?
      Äänestä nyt!
    • In this case, the questions raised before the Supreme Court arend the following onesy are as follow: Are Schenk’s acts protected by the Freedom of Speech, included in the First Amendment?
      JoembJoemb profile picture Kommentit
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 1
  • Lause 2
  • Lause 3
  • Lause 4
    • No, Schenk’s actions are not protected by the First Amendment and the ruling given by the District Court is in compliance with the First Amendment as it respects the Espionage Act.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4
  • Lause 5
  • Lause 6
  • Lause 7
    • Moreover, Freedom of speech always has limits when words and expressions are used in a way as to create a clear and present danger.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 7
  • Lause 8
  • Lause 9
    • Likewise, during wartime, many words and expressions that might be said in time of peace are harming its effort that their utterance will not be endured until the end of the war.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • Likewise, during wartime, many words and expressions that might be said in time of peace are harmcausing its effort thatmparity because their utterance will not be endured until the end of the war.
      JoembJoemb profile picture Kommentit
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 9ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 9
  • Lause 10