Korjaukset

In the following I will describe the two given graphs.

The first graph shows the Computer ownership from 2002 - 2010.

The x-graph shows the years 2002- 2010 in two-year steps while the y-graph gives you information about the per cent in 20 per cent steps.

It can be clearliy seen that the computer ownership has increased steadily.

While around 55 per cent of the people owned a computer in the year 2002, round about 75 per cent owned one in the year 2010.

This means that every year the ownership has increased by 5 per cent.

In conclusion the number of the ownershipment increased steadily.

The second graph compares the number of the ownership considering the level of education of the years 2002 and 2010.

The x-graph show the level of education while each level is divided into 2002 and 2010 while the y-graph gives you information about the amount of per cent again.

It shows clearly that better educated people in both years owned a computer more often than less educated ones.

The difference between no high school diplomas and incompleted college is higher than the difference between incompleted college and postgraduate qualification in both years although the growth in the year 2010 is less rapidly than in the year 2002.

The most significant gap between the two levels of education is in the year 2002 between the non high school educated and the high school graduant.

The amount of per cent in between those two bars is 20 per cent.

All in all you can say that the better educated people rather have a computer than the less educated people.

If you compare both of the paragraphs you can say that the number of computer uses influences the education system and gives the opportunity to improve the education.

(I hate graphs and have never been good at summarizing them.

I don't get how summarizing or analyzing a graph shows our language skills.)