Korjaukset

AUTA KORJAAMAAN NYT!korjattu

Text from green_elephant - English

  • Pointless discussions

    • Most people who have ever been involved in discussions on such topics as politics, religion or child labor are pretty sure that the truth is always by their side.
  • And these disputes often lead to conflicts.
    • As a result, people's relationship inevitably suffer.
    • So should people have an argument with each other if they have absolutely different opinion?
  • Some things just can not be proven because they do not have any mathematical proof.
    • For example, if anyone claims that a government takes higly effective measures upon something, referring to an annual official data, should the other person object to him?
    • He may just say that it is a lie and call the data a fake.
    • In my opinion, people should avoid arguing with individuals who can not imagine that another point of view merely exists.
    • It would make a life simplier and less nervous.

PLEASE, HELP TO CORRECT EACH SENTENCE! - English

  • Otsikko
  • Lause 1
    • Most people who have ever been involved in discussions on such topics as politics, religion or child labor are pretty sure that the truth is always by their side.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • Most people who have ever been involved in discussions on such topics as politics, religion or child labor are pretty sure that the truth is always byon their side.
      exRangerexRanger profile picture Kommentit
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 1
  • Lause 2
  • Lause 3
  • Lause 4
    • So should people have an argument with each other if they have absolutely different opinion?
      Äänestä nyt!
    • So should people have an argument with each otherargue if they have absolutely different opinions (or views) regarding an issue?
      exRangerexRanger profile picture Kommentit
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4
  • Lause 5
  • Lause 6
    • For example, if anyone claims that a government takes higly effective measures upon something, referring to an annual official data, should the other person object to him?
      Äänestä nyt!
    • For example, if any persone claims that athe government takesis taking highly effective measures upon something, referring to an annual official data, should the other person object to him?regarding some matter by referring to officially available data, should someone else take an opposing view?¶

      (note: Why not? It's not as if "officially available government data" aren't themselves falsified... have a look around the world of "Big Government Data & Statistics" ... many lies are told by "official sources".)
      exRangerexRanger profile picture Kommentit 1
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 6ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 6
  • Lause 7
  • Lause 8
    • In my opinion, people should avoid arguing with individuals who can not imagine that another point of view merely exists.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • In my opinion, people should avoid arguingments with individuals who can not imagine that anotherare unable to accept the possibility that alternative points of view merely existsexist and might be a more accurate reflection of the truth.
      exRangerexRanger profile picture Kommentit
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 8ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 8
  • Lause 9