Korjaukset

Text from Lantika - English

    • poem analysis

  • House is not a metaphor.
    • House has nothing to do with beak or wing.
    • House is not two hands held angled towards each other.
    • House is not its roof or the pine straw on its roof.
    • At night, its windows and doors look nothing like a face.
  • Its stairs are not vertebrae.
  • Its walls may be white.
    • They are not pale skin.
  • House does not appreciate your pun on its panes as pains.
    • House does not appreciate because house does not have feelings.
    • House has no aesthetic program.
    • House does what it does, which is not doing.
  • House does not sit on its foundations.
    • House exists in its foundations, and when the wind pushes itself to full gale, house is never the one crying.
    • from Conduit Now for my interpretation of House of enigma.
    • The author creates the image of the House in our head.
    • All we know that is house but when we read a poem our understanding is transformed.
    • We understand that this is something very different, not that we are accustomed to seeing.
  • The poet used special ways to create such a feeling.
    • Impersonation is expressive means of language.
    • The House is look like living things and we decide that it animate creature.
    • It is not simple to understand that the house is.
    • Although he has neither hands nor feelings but he compere to living beings and reader feels that he possesses the features of a living being.
    • It’s not clear which features. Perhaps mind.
    • Although image of the house creates through negation.
    • It is not simple to understand that the house is but we understand that he is animate, simply being in present.
    • The house create sense of integrity, not just a many parts assembled in one piece.
    • He is something indivisible, fundamental, that existence here and now.
    • Author is talking about something more cannot be all about the house

PLEASE, HELP TO CORRECT EACH SENTENCE! - English