Korjaukset

Text from flavien_rb - English

  • Into the wild

  • Do you understand Christopher's choices ?
  • Christopher Mccandless is a character of the movie into the wild who tells a story really.
    • Having been awarded a diploma, Chris decides to turn the back on his life favored to go to live alone in the deserts of Alaska, so without technology Chris with only four-month-old real-life experience in an abandoned bus, in a distant place.
    • I understand Chris on certain points in particular on his purpose, indeed it had for noble purpose to live a simple life, to be in the middle of nowhere, except the company, to feel all the weight of the nature and to give up the technology and the other modern things.
    • But I am in contradiction with him on the fact of leaving hastily because he was not really prepared and to live completely without technology can be dangerous.
    • The proof, Chris died in the nature four months after his first day in her abandoned bus, the nature was stronger than him In conclusion I think that this question to live outside the consumer society is only a subjective question because that this depends on the point of view and on the purpose in life

PLEASE, HELP TO CORRECT EACH SENTENCE! - English

  • Otsikko
  • Lause 1
  • Lause 2
  • Lause 3
    • Having been awarded a diploma, Chris decides to turn the back on his life favored to go to live alone in the deserts of Alaska, so without technology Chris with only four-month-old real-life experience in an abandoned bus, in a distant place.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • Having been awarded a diploma, Chris decides to turn thehis back on his life, favored to going to live alone in the deserts of Alaska, so without technology Chris with onlyAlaskan tundra. He spent four- month-old real-life experiences living in an abandoned bus, in a distant placewithout technology.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 3ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 3
  • Lause 4
    • I understand Chris on certain points in particular on his purpose, indeed it had for noble purpose to live a simple life, to be in the middle of nowhere, except the company, to feel all the weight of the nature and to give up the technology and the other modern things.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • I understand Chris on certain points in particular on his purpose, i. Indeed it, he had for noble purposeaspirations to live a simple life, to be in the middle of nowhere, except the company, to feel all the weight of the nature and to give up the technology and the other modern thingsature.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 4
  • Lause 5
    • But I am in contradiction with him on the fact of leaving hastily because he was not really prepared and to live completely without technology can be dangerous.
      Äänestä nyt!
    • But I am in contradictiondisagree with him on the facconcept of leaving hastily, because he was not really prepared, and to live completely without technology can be dangerous.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 5ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 5
  • Lause 6
    • The proof, Chris died in the nature four months after his first day in her abandoned bus, the nature was stronger than him In conclusion I think that this question to live outside the consumer society is only a subjective question because that this depends on the point of view and on the purpose in life
      Äänestä nyt!
    • The proof, is that Chris died in the nature four months after his first day in ther abandoned bus,. This shows theat nature was stronger than him. In conclusion, I think that thise question to live outside the consumer society is only a subjective question because ithat this depends on the point of view and on the purpose in life.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 6ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - Lause 6