수정본

Paoloxyz (으)로 부터 도착한메세지 - English

    • Chass players and computers

    • Chass players and computers In a video, on Internet, the famous russian chess champion, Garry Kasparov, explains which rapport should be among chess players and computers, softwares, that play at chess.
    • Maybe before the year 1996 he had a different opinion, but in 1996, the IBM computer, Deep Blue, beated he, famous world chess champion.
    • He said that the humans should not have fear of computers, of their intelligence, because they aren't really intelligent.
    • They solve their problems, essentially, only with brute force of calculus.
    • I don't believe that Kasparov was truly convinced of that he said.
    • In fact after the year 1996, when Deep Blue beat he, he invented a new form of chess game, he has named it "Advanced Chess".
    • It consist in the union of calculus resource and human intuition, in the hope to obtain a superior chess entity, that only chess player or only chess computer.
    • A few match already are played in this way, the results to seem confirm Kasparov idea, only if the chess human player, match with computer, is a very strong player.
    • Perhaps a day the machines will surpass us, or perhaps we will be like the machines, or still, we will be biological and machines together.
    • Practically a scenery of cyberpunk culture.

각 문장을 수정해주세요! - English

  • 제목
  • 문장 1
    • Chass players and computers In a video, on Internet, the famous russian chess champion, Garry Kasparov, explains which rapport should be among chess players and computers, softwares, that play at chess.
      투표하세요!
    • Chass players and computers¶

      In a video, on Internet, t
      The famous rRussian cChess champion, Garry Kasparov,
      explains which rapport should be amongin a video, that there should be a good rapport between chess players and, computers, and the softwares, ¶
      that play at c
      used to play in a game of Chess.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 1
  • 문장 2
    • Maybe before the year 1996 he had a different opinion, but in 1996, the IBM computer, Deep Blue, beated he, famous world chess champion.
      투표하세요!
    • Maybe before the year 1996 he had a different opinionidea, but in 1996, the IBM 's
      computer, Deep Blue, beat
      ed he, famous world chess champion him,the most famous chess player in the world.
      투표하세요!
    • Maybe before the year 1996 hHe may have had a different opinion before, but in 1996, the IBM
      computer,
      's "Deep Blue," beated he, the World famous world cChess cChampion.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 2
  • 문장 3
    • He said that the humans should not have fear of computers, of their intelligence, because they aren't really intelligent.
      투표하세요!
    • He said that the ,humans should not have fear of computers, of their intelligence,¶
      because they aren't really intelligent.
      투표하세요!
    • He said that the humans should not have fear of computers, of their intelligence
      of computers, because they aren't really intelligent.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 3
  • 문장 4
  • 문장 5
  • 문장 6
    • In fact after the year 1996, when Deep Blue beat he, he invented a new form of chess game, he has named it "Advanced Chess".
      투표하세요!
    • In fact after theat year 1996, when,while Deep Blue beat heim, he invented a new form¶
      of chess game, he has named it
      s "Advanced Chess".
      투표하세요!
    • In fact, after the year 1996, when Deep Blue beat hebeing beaten by Deep Blue in the year 1996, he invented a new form
      of cChess game, he has and named it "Advanced Chess".
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 6
  • 문장 7
    • It consist in the union of calculus resource and human intuition, in the hope to obtain a superior chess entity, that only chess player or only chess computer.
      투표하세요!
    • It consist ion the union of calculus resource and human intuition, in the hope¶
      to obtain a superior chess entity, that only chess player or only chess computer.
      투표하세요!
    • It consist ins of the union of calculus resource and human intuition, inwith the hope
      to obtain a superior chess entity, that only chess players or only chess computers can identify.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 7
  • 문장 8
    • A few match already are played in this way, the results to seem confirm Kasparov idea, only if the chess human player, match with computer, is a very strong player.
      투표하세요!
    • A few matches are already arebeing played in this way, and the results to seem to confirm Kasparov
      's idea,. This can be proved only if the cChess human player, match with computer, is a very strong play is as strong as the computer.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 8
  • 문장 9
    • Perhaps a day the machines will surpass us, or perhaps we will be like the machines, or still, we will be biological and machines together.
      투표하세요!
    • Perhaps there will be a day twhen machines will surpass us, or perhaps we will be like the¶
      machines, or still, we will be biological and machines togetherin one body being able to perform the qualities of a machine.
    • ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9ADD a NEW CORRECTION! - 문장 9
  • 문장 10