Korrigeringer

Tekst fra JulianECH - English

    • Three kinds of experiences

  • There are at least two kinds of experiences in the last description.
    • The first one is the experience of perception.
    • Examples of it are to see the dogs, to hear the seller of tangerines or to feel the warmth of the sun.
    • But sensitive perception does not exhaust the experience of perception.
    • We have also perceptions of our own body, as to feel our breathing, to feel how we move our limbs or even to feel how pain rise from the pit of the stomach as well as to feel sexual pleasure or to feel hungry.
  • How then can we define the experience of perception?
  • For now, we could say that the experience of perception can be defined by three aspects: 1.
    • That what is perceived, which is either an object of the external world ─that is, an object of which we can say that is not a part of myself─, or my own physical body ─that is, that part of myself composed by physical matter─; 2.
    • The mean of interaction with that object, which is our sensitive body ─we se by the eyes, we hear by the ears, we touch by the skin and we feel pleasure and pain by the secretions and connections of our nervous system [I use the preposition “by” to express causal dependence: due to the eyes, we see, sue to the ears, we hear, etcetera.
    • Is it the right preposition?]─; and 3.
  • The temporal dimension of the experience: both, the object of perception the experience of perception are always in the present moment.
  • The second kind of experience is the experience of remembering.
  • All what I did when I evoked the past experience of the first interaction with my mother was to remember.
    • The experience of remembering can be define by the distinction with the three aspects that have defined the experience of perception: 1.
  • What is remembered is not an object of the external world or my own body, but a past experience of perception.
  • As a perception is always a current experience, when a perception finishes, it becomes in a memory.
    • The memories exist only in our own mind.
  • Therefore, what is remembered (that is, the object of the remembering experiences) are contents of our mind. 2.
    • The mean of interaction with that object are not our senses or our nervous system, but the neural system, which is in charge of activating every mental content. 3.
    • In the temporal dimension of remembering we can do a distinction: the experience of remembering as a human activity is in the present moment, but the object of that experience refers to past experiences of perception: we remember now something that has happened.
    • Now the content of the thoughts of the act of interpretation of my neighbor’s face seems not to fit in any of those two kinds of experiences.
  • I am not seeing the thoughts of my neighbor as when I see a dog in the street and I am not remembering a past experience of perception of his thoughts.
  • Indeed, perceiving the thoughts of anyone is impossible because they are not physical objects of the world.
    • So, it must be a third kind of experience, whose object is the genre comprehending of the content of the thoughts of an act of interpretation.
  • There is a kind of experience whose only difference with the experience of remembering is it’s the content object of reference.
  • That is the experience of imagination.
    • As in the remembering, in the imagination the object of reference ─what is remembered or imagined─ is a content of our mind.
  • The image is different of the memory by the way they are constituted.
    • While the content of the memory is only a passive creation because I shouldn’t do anything to create it, but it emerged by its own from a experience of perception, the content of the image is an active creation of the self, because to create it I must take a content, either mental or external, and vary it or matched with another content.
    • We perceive or remember something and then we wonder, to say, how would it be if…?
    • That is how all the fantastic creatures as unicorns and sphinxes were created.
    • Otherwise, the experience of imagination has the same mean of interaction with its object as the experience of remembering, as that mean can only be connections made by neuronal system, but it, the imagination, has the same temporal dimension as the experience of perception, because both its object of reference and the experience itself are in the present moment.

VÆR SÅ SNILL, HJELP TIL MED Å RETTE HVER SETNING! - English

  • Tittel
  • Setning 1
  • Setning 2
  • Setning 3
  • Setning 4
  • Setning 5
    • We have also perceptions of our own body, as to feel our breathing, to feel how we move our limbs or even to feel how pain rise from the pit of the stomach as well as to feel sexual pleasure or to feel hungry.
      Stem nå!
    • We have also perceptions ofabout our own body, as toies. We feel our breathing, to feel how we move our limbs or even to feel howthe pain that arises from the pit of theour stomachs, as well as to feel sexual pleasure or to feel hungery.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 5LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 5
  • Setning 6
  • Setning 7
  • Setning 8
    • That what is perceived, which is either an object of the external world ─that is, an object of which we can say that is not a part of myself─, or my own physical body ─that is, that part of myself composed by physical matter─; 2.
      Stem nå!
    • That what is perceived, which is either an object of the external world that is, an object of which we can say that is not a part of myself─, or my own physical body ─that is, that part of myself, composed byof physical matter─; 2.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 8LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 8
  • Setning 9
    • The mean of interaction with that object, which is our sensitive body ─we se by the eyes, we hear by the ears, we touch by the skin and we feel pleasure and pain by the secretions and connections of our nervous system [I use the preposition “by” to express causal dependence: due to the eyes, we see, sue to the ears, we hear, etcetera.
      Stem nå!
    • The mean ofOur interaction with that object, which is our sensitive body ─we se by the eyes, we hear by the . Our eyes see, our ears hears, we touch by the skin and weour skin has the ability feel pleasure andor pain byecause of the secretions and connections of our nervous system [I use the preposition “by” to express causal dependence: due to the eyes, we see, sdue to the ears, we hear, etcetera.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 9LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 9
  • Setning 10
  • Setning 11
    • The temporal dimension of the experience: both, the object of perception the experience of perception are always in the present moment.
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 11LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 11
  • Setning 12
  • Setning 13
  • Setning 14
    • The experience of remembering can be define by the distinction with the three aspects that have defined the experience of perception: 1.
      Stem nå!
    • The experience of remembering can be define byd as the distinction with theof three aspects that have defined the experience of perception: 1.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 14LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 14
  • Setning 15
  • Setning 16
  • Setning 17
  • Setning 18
  • Setning 19
    • The mean of interaction with that object are not our senses or our nervous system, but the neural system, which is in charge of activating every mental content. 3.
      Stem nå!
    • The means of interaction with that object are not our senses or our nervous system, but the neural system, which is in charge of activating every mental content. 3.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 19LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 19
  • Setning 20
    • In the temporal dimension of remembering we can do a distinction: the experience of remembering as a human activity is in the present moment, but the object of that experience refers to past experiences of perception: we remember now something that has happened.
      Stem nå!
    • In the temporal dimension of remembering we can do a distinctionguish: the experience of remembering as a human activity is in the present moment, but the object of that experience refers to past experiences of perception: we remember nowthat something that has happened.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 20LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 20
  • Setning 21
    • Now the content of the thoughts of the act of interpretation of my neighbor’s face seems not to fit in any of those two kinds of experiences.
      Stem nå!
    • Now, the content of the thoughts of the act of interpretation ofing my neighbor’s face seems not to fit in any of thoseto either two kinds of experiences.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 21LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 21
  • Setning 22
    • I am not seeing the thoughts of my neighbor as when I see a dog in the street and I am not remembering a past experience of perception of his thoughts.
      100% GOOD (1 votes)
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 22LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 22
  • Setning 23
  • Setning 24
    • So, it must be a third kind of experience, whose object is the genre comprehending of the content of the thoughts of an act of interpretation.
      Stem nå!
    • So, it must be a third kind of experience, whose object is the genre comprehendingsion of the contents of the thoughts of an act of interpretation.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 24LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 24
  • Setning 25
  • Setning 26
  • Setning 27
  • Setning 28
  • Setning 29
    • While the content of the memory is only a passive creation because I shouldn’t do anything to create it, but it emerged by its own from a experience of perception, the content of the image is an active creation of the self, because to create it I must take a content, either mental or external, and vary it or matched with another content.
      Stem nå!
    • While tThe content of the memory is only a passive creation because I shouldn’don't do anything to create it, but i. It emerged byon its own from an experience of perception, t. Fhe content of the image is an active creation of the self, because to create it I must take a content, either mental or external, and either vary it or matched it with another content.
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 29LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 29
  • Setning 30
  • Setning 31
  • Setning 32
    • Otherwise, the experience of imagination has the same mean of interaction with its object as the experience of remembering, as that mean can only be connections made by neuronal system, but it, the imagination, has the same temporal dimension as the experience of perception, because both its object of reference and the experience itself are in the present moment.
      Stem nå!
    • Otherwise, the experience of imagination has the same means of interaction with its object as the experience of remembering, as that mean can only its object bey connections made bywithin neuronal system, but it, the i. Imagination, has the same temporal dimension as the experience of perception, because both itsthe object of reference and the experience itself are in the present moment. ¶
    • LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 32LEGG TIL EN NY RETTELSE! - Setning 32