수정본

Discuss both sides and give your opinion?

Some people believe that only governments must preserve people of crime while some other people have a different idea; they think that each one should be protecting themselves of crime.

On the one hand, some people hold a view that self-protection is a more useful way to avoid of crime.

For instance: in some countries like Japan, China and etc offenders are not able to injure people because women and children undergo of training so they are able to preserve themselves of damages.

Then offenders are not able to misuse of people if people are being careful and sufficient self-confidence and awareness.

On the other hand, others hold opposite ideas; firstly, governments should catch offenders for protecting innocent people.

After that they trying to rehabilitate former prisoners back to the society in effective ways so they can be provided safely in a community.

Secondly, if governments resolve society's economic problems not only they are able to prevent crimes but also they can provide mental security for people because both of them connect to each other.

This essay we have discussed why persons should acquire some self-defense techniques.

We have also explained why government's duties are more important for reducing crimes rate.

In my position, if governments considered to safe society, criminals could not have detrimental behavior to other people so their role is more efficient in preventing crime and it is only delusion if we think that there are not crimes in the society, people are able to defend of themselves.