सुधार

Woven baskets

• Initially, the argument points out that any Palean boats have not been found, thus people from Palea could not cross the river.

• However, the author claims to hastily that the Palean people had no boats.

• It is unclear that maybe these archaeologists are still exploring that location with the aim to find these boats.

• It also can be said that even if none of boats will not be found, it doesn’t mean that the Palean people could not cross the river.

• Perhaps, at that time they might not have necessary skills and knowledge to build a boat.

• There might be another evidence of their ability to cross the river, for example, huge parts of trees, the remains of axes and ropes.

• In order if the Brim River was not big as nowadays, people from Palea could easily cross it.

• For instance, they might swim across the river.

• Ultimately, if people had no chance to cross it, the author didn't take into account such variant as trade at that time.

• It can be assumed that people in Palea had trade connections with any other tribe, and this tribe could buy these Palean baskets from the Palean people.

• In its turn, people from another tribe could have an opportunity cross this river and sell the Palean baskets in the Lithos village.

• In conclusion, it is necessary to have other additional evidences to get a complete understanding of strengths and weaknesses of the article.

• In this case, it would be great to give more information about researchers in that area and also things found by archaeologists there.

• The useful information would be data about the Brim River, and how it has changed since the prehistoric time.

• Without additional evidence, however, one should be especially wary about accepting the truth of the argument’s conclusion.